The Third World War Will Start With Putin, Trump, and Xi Jinping

The Third World War, which some consider to have been ignited 30-40 years ago, was fueled by Putin's quest for global dominance.

In 1987, it was reported that Trump was recruited by the KGB, taking on the agent alias Krasnov, according to an FBI document.

Now, Ukraine and other Western democracies stand as primary targets of Putin's aggression.

At first, Orban (from Hungary, an EU member) was a pawn in Putin's game, attempting to sway Ukraine; however, his efforts fell short compared to his more covert, violent maneuvers in Hungary. While Hungary saw minor violence, it pales in comparison to the devastation unfolding in Ukraine.

Countries like Belarus and Tajikistan have already suffered under Putin's shadow, and his sights are now set on Georgia, Moldova, and Romania, among others.

Additionally, nations such as Germany, France, and Italy have been found to harbor right-wing Putin-allies whom Trump, Vance, and Musk are also trying to influence.

Putin's ongoing assault on Ukraine lays bare a grim reality of our times. Trump's disturbing alliance with him only deepens the crisis.

Biden had the right strategy, which the Trump team is now destroying, helping Putin continue his wars against Europe, especially.

The Third World War is partly fueled by Trump's support for Putin's agenda. Manipulating US politics may have been relatively straightforward for Putin; on the other hand, Europe presents a formidable challenge.

Even if Trump, Musk, and Vance attempt to apply their American election strategies to Europe, they will find it impossible to sway the European public.

Europeans are characterized by their independent thinking and robust education; they have lived through the horrors of regimes like the Nazis and will not yield to Putin's very similar threats, including the specter of atomic warfare.

They will also fiercely resist any notion that Musk and pro-Russian oligarchs can escape to Mars in the aftermath of a potential nuclear conflict.

Musk is constantly referring to Armageddon on Earth and escaping to Mars, without mentioning an atomic war.

The Third World War is now unfolding because Trump is aiding Putin.

But both Trump and Putin grossly underestimate the resilience of European democracies; they perceive them as fragile, yet the truth is far different. Trump's and Putin's outdated Nazi-strategy from the Second World War is not a show of strength but a testament to their profound weakness. History shows that only democracies prosper.

Dictatorship will always fall and is outdated in a modern, civilized world. We have evolved beyond our primitive instincts.

Thanks to Trump, the US will be isolated from the world's most profound democracies. Trump is at some point in the future likely to withdraw from NATO and the UN, giving himself and Putin free hands to attack NATO allies.

Or, as he now suggests, he will decide on a case-by-case basis what he will support in NATO in the event of a conflict. The US is no longer a reliable member of NATO. 

The United States will certainly suffer greatly, and its international standing will be weakened. Russia will attack the US in the future if Trump is still president, so Putin can be sure to avoid a counterattack.

The US is already controlled and being robbed/weakened by the pro-Russian Republicans—the US is on the verge of becoming a satellite state of Russia.

It is funny to read about the accusations against any of Trump's ministers and leaders. The criticism should be of Trump. He fires all who do not defend everything he claims to be true. They have no choice but to lie for Trump.

The only one not lying is the chief of the Federal Reserve - also appointed by Trump, but not lying to the people.

The world economy is of paramount importance to the US, and that is why only Powell can effectively manage inflation.

If it were not for Powell, all prices would have increased by much more than 2.7% as they have until now.

If Putin had not controlled Trump to destroy the US and world economy, Trump would thank Powell for helping the people have low prices despite Trump's and Putin's attacks on the economy.

The deportations, tariffs, and resistance against Powell are all about destroying the US economy. That is the consequence we can all see now.

Investors worldwide are selling billions of American stocks every day because they have lost their trust in the US dollar.

Only Powell is keeping some investors interested in US companies. If Powell is removed, they will also flee the US financial market, and inflation will rise to levels never seen before.

They do not let the lies from the White House deceive them. They see the facts easily. Only the Trump supporters can not see that they are being ruined.*

*However, recent data suggest that President Donald Trump's approval rating is declining among high-income earners, as shown by polling data from The Economist/YouGov. This trend is linked to concerns over the economy and dissatisfaction with his policy choices. It's good to know that we have intelligent Republicans! We hope they will vote for democrats in 2026. It would be wise. We are former Republicans and can see that the economic policies were far better with Biden.

Even billionaires will be there soon, just like Musk. Trump, controlled by Putin, shows no mercy to oligarchs or anyone else, except themselves.

Trump is now (as of July 2025) more unpopular among his supporters than ever before. This is not good for Putin, who started promoting Trump's presidency 30 years ago.

That is why we now see Trump doing what his supporting Republicans are asking him to do, threatening Putin, and selling weapons to NATO. It is all a show for the galleries. Trump can stop doing it any time. Putin and Trump are playing with people as usual.

Putin attempts to manipulate

Putin is telling the narrative, insisting that Ukraine — a former ally of the Soviet Union — staged a coup against it. However, the truth is starkly different. After the Soviet Union crumbled, Ukraine made a historic choice in a decisive election, with an overwhelming ninety percent of its citizens voting for independence. A compelling map of the election results clearly illustrates this monumental decision.

The real coup unfolded when Putin imposed a puppet regime in Ukraine, backing this aggressive maneuver with relentless force. The tragic assassination of a prominent politician serves as a grim reminder of Putin's notorious strategy to silence dissent. His belief that the populace lacks the awareness to challenge his authority is not only alarming but also emblematic of his oppressive regime.

Moreover, the assertion that "NATO is constantly trying to bring Ukraine into its fold" is a blatant falsehood. NATO has never actively pursued Ukraine's membership, not even once. In a stunning display of hypocrisy, it was actually Putin who sought NATO membership for Russia, illuminating his deceitful tactics.

When Putin launched his unjust assault on Ukraine in 2022, he spread the outrageous claim that NATO was set to attack the Kremlin. This narrative, like many others, was a transparent fabrication aimed at misleading the Russian populace.

Many countries are working tirelessly to safeguard their borders against Putin's aggressive military actions. Yet, the path to NATO membership is intricate, requiring unanimous consent from all current member states. Ukraine's aspirations for NATO and EU membership have consistently been met with rejection, lacking the necessary endorsement.

The idea of Ukraine aligning with NATO exists solely in Putin's distorted imagination — a belief that the international community categorically dismisses. This misrepresentation serves merely as a pretext for his acts of terror inflicted not only on his own citizens but also on those of neighboring nations and beyond.

In 1991, Ukraine conducted a pivotal referendum to determine its future. Voters were asked whether they wanted Ukraine to become an independent sovereign state or to remain aligned with the Russian Federation. The overwhelming majority chose to support Ukraine's sovereignty, marking a decisive moment in the nation's history and affirming its desire for independence. These votes are the truth of what the Ukrainian people want. Putin's election results are always the opposite of the truth, both in Ukraine and Russia. Precisely as Trump's intentions are always the opposite of what he claims they are. They follow each other's strategies 100%.

Vladimir Putin has been fixated on Ukraine.

Since the Orange Revolution, which began on November 22, 2004, when protests erupted over a Putin-rigged presidential election in Kyiv, has Putin interfered in the internal political process

Few anticipated that this would lead to the most significant conflict in Europe since World War II. Putin aimed to undermine Ukraine, seeing it as a challenge to authoritarian rule.

While the revolution brought Viktor Yushchenko to power in Ukraine, it failed to bring about the political change many Ukrainians had hoped for. Yushchenko's presidency was marked by infighting, and he lost the 2010 election to Viktor Yanukovych, who had played a key role in the Orange Revolution.

Despite its shortcomings, the revolution underscored the growing divide between Ukraine and Russia. Russia under Putin centralized power, while Ukraine exhibited a more fragmented political landscape. Vladimir Putin supported Viktor Yanukovych in the 2004 presidential election. After Yanukovych won, Putin called for a crackdown on protesters, highlighting the increasing rift between Ukraine and Russia.

Since then, Ukraine has steadily distanced itself from Russia. Putin played a crucial personal role in the Orange Revolution. Russian television, which many people in Ukraine watched at the time, heavily supported Yanukovych's candidacy in the lead-up to the Ukrainian presidential election.

On the eve of the vote, Putin made the critical decision to intervene directly. In late October 2004, he traveled to Kyiv, where he was greeted with a military parade. Then, he went on national TV to lecture the Ukrainian public about why they should support his preferred presidential pick.

It soon became apparent that Putin had miscalculated. His open and unapologetic attempt to interfere in Ukraine's internal affairs was widely interpreted as a grave insult and an indication of his contempt for Ukraine's statehood. This angered the public and helped mobilize millions of Ukrainians to participate in politics.

Weeks later, after a flawed second round of voting, Ukrainians came to Kyiv in large numbers to protest the election result. Putin's actions were one of the leading causes of the Orange Revolution. Putin's attempts to assert control over Ukraine over the past twenty years have consistently backfired, driving the two countries apart.

In 2013, he pressured his ally, Yanukovych, to renounce European integration, leading to a second revolution and Yanukovych's downfall. In February 2014, Putin initiated military action by seizing Crimea and later sending troops to Ukraine's Donetsk region. When this intervention reinforced Ukraine's desire for independence, he began planning the full-scale invasion of February 2022.

Since Putin's ambition to reclaim Ukraine has defined his rule, he has sacrificed Russia's economic stability, international standing, and relations with the developed world in pursuit of this goal.

This shift in his worldview became apparent after the revolution, when he launched RT, establishing Russia as a major player in the dissemination of anti-Western disinformation. In 2005, the Kremlin encouraged Russians to wear orange and black ribbons to honor Soviet victories, a direct response to Ukrainian symbolism that has since fueled a cult of World War II veneration. This obsession with Ukraine stems from Putin's imperialist view of Russian identity and his experiences as a KGB officer during the Soviet collapse. In 1989, Putin was in East Germany when the Berlin Wall fell, witnessing the collapse of Soviet control amid pro-democracy protests.

He claims his superiors told him, "Moscow is silent, "a lesson that haunts him today as he perceives any loss of influence as a threat to Russia. Putin is particularly sensitive to Ukraine's national awakening and its embrace of European democracy, viewing Ukraine as a crucial part of Russia's identity. His opposition to Ukrainian independence began after the 2004 Orange Revolution, and he has consistently called the USSR's fall" the greatest political catastrophe of the twentieth century."

Currently, the ongoing Russian invasion stems from Putin's belief that losing Ukraine poses an existential threat to Russia. Any compromise with the Kremlin is futile; peace will only be achievable if it is made clear that Ukrainian independence is reversible.

Imposing neutrality on Ukraine will not stop Putin or bring lasting peace to Europe. In the wake of Donald Trump's election, speculation about a negotiated settlement in the Russian-Ukrainian war has resurfaced.

Putin has reiterated his demand for Ukraine's neutrality, insisting that good relations between Russia and Ukraine are difficult to envision without it.

This demand has been consistent since the full-scale invasion and was a key point during early peace talks. Some in the international community view this demand as reasonable, arguing that NATO's expansion has provoked conflict. They believe a neutral Ukraine could appease Russia. However, reports suggest that Ukraine's aspirations for NATO membership might be considered part of a peace deal.

Such a move would be a grave mistake, as it would leave Ukraine vulnerable to further Russian aggression. Ukrainians have already learned that neutrality does not shield them from Russia's aggression. Despite adopting a non-aligned status during Yanukovych's presidency, Russia attempted to exert control over Ukraine, ultimately using military force when faced with resistance.

Since the 2014 invasion, Putin has cited Ukraine's potential NATO membership as a rationale for aggression, despite Ukraine showing little progress toward joining the alliance. NATO has only spoken vaguely about Ukraine's future membership, knowing this to be an exaggerated threat used by Putin to justify his actions. No member of NATO has spoken in favor of Ukraine's membership, not until now.

Notably, when Finland and Sweden sought NATO membership after Russia's invasion, Putin showed indifference despite the strategic implications for Russia. His troop withdrawals from the Finnish border suggest that he does not view NATO as a genuine threat. It was a big lie to justify his war. He even claimed that NATO was going to attack the Kremlin to justify his war to the Russians. Putin's genuine concern lies in NATO's ability to deter Russia's bullying of its neighbors. This suggests that Putin's criticism of Ukraine's NATO aspirations is driven by a desire to undermine Ukrainian sovereignty rather than genuine security concerns. For years, Putin has made no secret of his belief that the emergence of an independent Ukraine is a historical mistake and a symbol of modern Russia's retreat from empire.

He has repeatedly claimed that Ukraine is not a "real country" and is fond of declaring that Ukrainians are Russians. In July 2021, Putin even published an entire essay arguing against the legitimacy of an independent Ukrainian state.

Since the start of the full-scale invasion, it has become increasingly clear that Putin's ultimate goal is not Ukraine's neutrality but its destruction. The Kremlin's propaganda machine has portrayed Ukraine as intolerant of Russian sentiment and promoted the idea that Ukraine's continued existence is incompatible with Russia's security. Ukraine's people are independent-minded democrats, as are people in every other European country.

Meanwhile, Putin has compared his invasion to the imperial conquests of 18th-century Russian ruler Peter the Great and has repeatedly claimed that he is returning "historically Russian land". Putin's imperialist outbursts must be taken seriously.

Throughout occupied Ukraine, his soldiers and administrators are already imposing a reign of terror that directly echoes the criminal logic of his imperial fantasies. Millions have been displaced, and thousands more have disappeared into a vast network of camps and prisons. Those who remain face a policy of relentless Russification and suppression.

Adults must accept Russian citizenship to access essential services, while children are forced to undergo indoctrination in schools that teach a new Kremlin curriculum.

The crimes currently taking place in Russian-occupied Ukraine are a clear indication of what awaits the rest of the country if Trump and Putin succeed.

Despite several military setbacks, he remains fully committed to his maximalist goals of ending Ukrainian independence and erasing Ukrainian identity.

Furthermore, since 2022, Putin has demonstrated that he is willing to wait as long as it takes to overcome Ukrainian resistance and is willing to pay almost any price to achieve his imperial ambitions, including atomic bombs.

Imposing neutrality on Ukraine under these circumstances would be tantamount to condemning the country to a slow but sure death. Any peace process that does not provide Ukraine with credible long-term security guarantees is doomed to failure.

Giving in to Putin's demands for a neutral Ukraine may offer some short-term relief from the threat of an expansionist Russia. Still, it would ultimately lead to more war and the likely collapse of the current global security order. There is simply no plausible argument for insisting on Ukrainian neutrality other than the desire to leave the country defenseless.

Peace will only come when Putin is finally compelled to recognize Ukraine's right to exist as an independent country and a member of the international community.

This includes, of course, the right to choose security alliances. It is absurd to prioritize Russia's disingenuous security concerns over Ukraine's very real fears of national annihilation.

Instead, when serious negotiations begin in the coming month, Ukraine's security must be the top priority. Until Ukraine is secure, Europe will remain insecure, and the threat of Russian imperialism will continue to loom over the continent.

Peace will only be achievable when Putin recognizes Ukraine's sovereign right to exist as an independent nation and embraces its rightful place in the democratic world, including its choice of security alliances.

It is entirely unreasonable to dismiss Russia's fabricated security concerns against Ukraine's genuine and rising fears for its survival. In any negotiation, Ukraine's security must take the stage. As long as Ukraine feels threatened, Europe will remain vulnerable, and the specter of Russian imperialism will persist.

Putin has broken all peace agreements with Ukraine since 1994, so no one believes this time will be the last time he attacks Ukraine again after a new peace deal. This time, he gets all the help he can wish for from Trump. Now is the time to support Ukraine more than ever. There is undeniable evidence that Putin is actively positioning himself for significant conflicts.

Meanwhile, Trump is facilitating this agenda at an alarming pace, particularly by stirring tension with European democracies. Never before have two leaders, Trump and Putin, shown such urgency to instigate wars. Trump's actions help Putin, leaving no doubt about his complicity in this dangerous game.

Even if Putin had been the president of the US himself, he could not have destroyed the US and the Western democracies more or faster than Trump has done in the first three months of his presidency.

And it will get worse until the US is totally weakened and has lost all influence and friends worldwide. As long as the pro-Russian Republicans help Russia, only Europe can save us.

And remember, Europe has always supported the US before Trump, and will do it again when Democrats regain power. However, they cannot support the pro-Russians in the current situation.

Putin needs to secure the support of MAGA Republicans. Trump is getting more and more unpopular among all Republicans.

Putin has therefore allowed Trump to sell weapons to Ukraine again, as the Kremlin says, it will change nothing. Putin has already recovered, with numerous weapon industries. At the same time, Putin can put economic pressure on the EU and weaken all EU countries that pay for the weapons.

Now, Putin can bomb the rest of Ukraine better when Ukraine tries to fight back. It suits Putin perfectly. No peace deal anymore in sight!

Direct democracy and boycotting are gaining momentum worldwide. However, this is not happening as Americans would like.

European investors have largely given up on supporting US companies, selling American stocks for billions of dollars every day. No one will ever trust Republicans again.

People worldwide are stopping to buy American products, even if their politicians plead with them not to do so.

Please boycott the pro-Russian and oligarchs' companies now!

Perhaps we can avoid the fate of all sound American companies that now must suffer for Putin's and Trump's war efforts.

Let's boycott pro-Putin Nazi-companies like Tesla instead! And vote for Democrats in 2026, it can only be better than voting for Republicans again!!